21 January 2008

The Peculiar Institution

Slavery, as it came to be in the United States of America, was quite the "peculiar institution." Here lies the major place where preachers and theologians (both Northern and Southern) went wrong in their exegesis/hermeneutics (interpretation) per the Bible: Slavery in America was different than slavery in many ancient cultures (including Israel and Rome). Period.

The belief that God preferred America over all other nations (hence, many viewed America as the New Israel; Manifest Destiny)only complicated things. I'll save that discussion for another day.

The conviction that ancient slavery and modern American slavery are two completely different entities is true in (at least) three major ways.

First, slavery in America was for life. In most ancient cultures, slavery was a fixed sentence. In fact, in Israel's life, God makes his chosen nation release the slaves after a fixed period of time. In America however, once you were a slave it was virtually impossible to break out of the shackles that bound (save Frederick Douglas).

Second, slavery in America tore apart family systems. Marriages between slaves were not honored . . .children were torn apart from their mother's and father's as an afterthought. If you want to get a sense of the moral corruption this produces, read the Pulitzer Prize Winning novel, The Known World.

Third, slavery in America was primarily relegated to one race: Africans/Blacks. This is perhaps the greatest tragedy of Social/Religious life in America. This is what many "smooth" over, turning their privileged noses in apathy. The slave system that fueled southern life was based upon the belief that blacks were inferior to all whites. Blacks, in this epistemology, were non-human; animals despised by their superior counterparts.


The Civil War (and the Emancipation Proclamation) may have dealt with slavery but it did not . . . it could not . . . deal with the pervasive attitude that Blacks were an inferior being.

This is why Martin Luther King is such an important leader in American/World History. He reminded one of the greatest civilizations in the history of the world that her foundational documents declared every person equal under the eye of the all seeing God. He challenged America to live up the very ideals she dared to boast to the rest of the world. He called America to actually be who she thought she was: a land where all men and women are recognized as persons created in the image of God.

The question that keeps me up some nights: What will my children point out in thirty years, "Dad . . .how did you miss that? How did you not see God moving in that area . . . among those people?"

I'm told by many scholars today that there are more persons living in slavery (e.g. sex slavery in Asia) today then there were during just prior to America's bloody Civil War.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm really glad you posted this, this is something that is close to my heart (and part of what I plan on researching in grad school). and if I may add a sidenote without sparking a debate-I think the attitude of slavery (African Americans are inferior and their position in life and society reflects their capabilities-which I could not disagree more with-btw) is still existing in society). I wish there was a way to change that attitude. Especially since African American culture has and does contribute so much to American culture. ok-I'm done now. Youre free to delete this if need be...

Josh Graves said...

Boutzers.

Thanks for the note. What kind of grad studies will you be pursuing?

Josh Graves said...

Readers of this post. A good friend of mine, e-mailed me these thoughts. Some affirm what I've written, some challenge my generalizations.

Just to show I'm about the practice of dialog, I'm posting his rich comments here because, well, I think he's right.

BTW--obviously, you can tell this "friend of mine" is a scholar.

---
Josh,



I enjoyed your blog posting on slavery. You are right to point out the differences between slavery in the ancient world and slavery in the antebellum south. But be careful about over-generalizing the nature of ancient slavery. There were different levels of slaves and slavery in the Greco-Roman world, and some slaves (galley slaves, mining slaves) most likely suffered every bit as much as African slaves in America, or even more, being worked to death. You’ve probably read it, but Ferguson has a brief discussion on the various types of slaves in his Backgrounds of Early Christianty (pp. 56-58 in the2nd ed.)

Even Egyptian slaves, if the account of Israel’s experiences in Exodus is to be taken seriously, was designed not simply for labor but also for population control or genocide.


Likewise, while they all likely had a notion of racial superiority, some American slave owners were comparatively benevolent and saw their slaves as a trust from God, souls in their care. Kelly S. Johnson has a brief but interesting discussion of this idea of stewardship of slaves in the American south in her recent The Fear of Beggars (Eerdmans, 2007) pp. 93-97. She’s not endorsing the idea. She is simply using it to illustrate the origin and changing perceptions of stewardship in Christianity.

Also, it is worth noting that in ancient Israel, it was only Hebrew slaves that were released in the 7th year (Exod 21:1ff; Deut 15:12ff). There were no such provisions for non-Hebrew slaves. To be sure, slaves were to be treated humanely (Lev 25:44ff), though they could apparently stike/beat their slaves to discipline, if it did not include permanent damage (Exod 21:20-21,26-27). It even seems that families could be broken up, unless a male Hebrew slave decides to stay with his owner/master (Exod 21:4-5).

I do believe that the Bible sets a trajectory for undermining the institution of slavery, and it is probably not coincidence that the first nations to abolish slavery were the so-called “Christian” nations.

Josh Graves said...

Here's a portion of my response to my friend's e-mail:


I agree with your larger point (avoiding generalities) and your smaller points (racism, slavery's tenure, family, etc.). I just finished reading "The Civil War as Theological Crisis" (Mark Knoll) and rattled off a late blog post without thinking through the entire picture as you've done so in your e-mail.

Seriously. . . thanks again, great thoughts to sharpen my own thinking.

---

P.S. For those interested--Mark Knoll has written to excellent books on this subject: "America's God" and "The Civil War as Theological Crisis."

Anonymous said...

I'm currently researching grad schools, but the plan is to find a good program that incorporates cultural and literary studies. More specifically, I am looking for one that integrates African American, Russian and Soviet, and some American culture and literare-with a focus on modernity through a theoretical lens...

I'm adding you to my blog list.

Anonymous said...

wow this is kind of crazy. it appears that while you were writing this i was watching the amazing grace movie. that is such an awesome movie that at so many moments convicts me straight to the core. but i gotta say i think you may be answering your own question. i think in 30 years people will look at us and say how did you miss all the slavery still actually happening. Whether it be the hardcore slavery that is happening in disgusting ways all over the world or whether it is the mental/spiritual/emotional/financial slavery that keeps so many people living in those areas of cass corridor that you have grown to love. because i think even though so many people give of their time in our inner cities across the nation- this isn't just an inner city problem. yes- it is prevelent in the inner city and yes- it is easy to identify in the inner city but this is everywhere. i think they will look back and say how could you miss that person living on your street in slavery. (p.s.- by you i don't mean you josh graves... i mean you in general) i would really love to think that as time goes on more and more people will realize the power that prayer and action together have to break long standing bonds of slavery. the power to free the captive... it's for real. and someday, whether it's 30yrs or not, people will come to that FULL realization and they will wonder why we didn't see it all along.

Josh Ross said...

It is appalling that the early American Christian leaders (even in the Restoration Movement) argued for slavery using Scripture.

I didn't go back and read "Fergie" (aka--Ferguson) today, but he elaborates in his book on the fact that slavery in the Greco-Roman world wasn't confined to race. The tone of skin didn't matter.

He also comments that in Rome, approximately 2/3 of the city was made up of slaves. However, when you walked down the road, you couldn't point at someone and say, "He is a slave or she is a slave." The leaders were frightened that if the slaves knew that there were so many of them, they could have easily formed groups and revolted. (Just a side note).

I appreciate the comments made by your "friend."

jon zebedee said...

ancient and american slavery are different. agreed.

but the problem still remains that the mosaic law still regards slaves as property. and to say that god wrote that is ridiculous. period.

preacherman said...

Josh,
Excellent post.

Josh Graves said...

Cassie: Oh. It's all making sense now.

Josh: Good point. That's what scares me . . . what practices or non-practices will be deemed appalling by future generations? BTW David Lipscomb was pretty progressive on Race Relations--he was a stud all the way around.

Jon: Have you read "Slaves, Women, and Homosexuals"--??? What did you think? If not, it's a book on "cultural analysis" in relationship with biblical interpretation. FYI.


Preacherman: you are Super Blogger!

JLH: Thanks for your thoughts. Slavery can be found in many different forms. No doubt about it.