15 January 2008

Church Numbers, The Nation of Islam

Last night, I sat on a panel with ministers and pastors from various evangelical denominations to discuss “Big Church/Small Church: A Conversation about Church Growth, Evangelism, and Church in the Age of Marketing.”

Once again, Calvin Moore has done an excellent job with putting together this series (House of God).

Some of the ministers represented pastor mega-churches (22,000 and 6,000 respectively). I represented the medium-large church (1,000—less than one percent of all American churches are larger than 850 people). Three other pastors represented “small churches” (200, 20, and 15 respectively).

I toyed with idea of beginning the panel with this quote, “I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it’s easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?”—President Bush in Washington D.C.; June 14, 2006

Or, I could've turned to Michael Scott for wisdom: ". . . Am I a great leader? Yes. Yes I am."

The conversations ranged from whether or not Joel Osteen’s church is “orthodox” to Barak Obama’s UCC ties in Chicago (c.f. African emphasis); to the marketing that takes place in the confines of the “evangelical Christian ghetto.” It was a spirited conversation, full of wisdom, passion, experience, and (some) humility.

When discussing the mystical (my word) relationship between the people of God and the gathering of God’s people, I told this story.

Along with one other college friend, I once went to hear Cummings debate two Muslim ministers, over a two day period, concerning the reliability of Scripture versus the truthfulness of the Koran. I went to hear Cummings the first night by myself. I was the only white person “in the house.” I was treated with great respect and dignity by the Christians hosting this event. The second night was the debate/dialog session between Muslim Ministers and Christian pastors.

It was quite a scene.

There were only two white guys in the standing-room only auditorium—yours truly and Mark Johnson (who was probably wondering what I’d talked him into exactly). For the most part, the dialog was amicable. Many fine philosophical and theological points were highlighted and debated. What I remember from this night, however, had little do with the former and everything to do with identity.

Near the end of the session, a middle-aged black man sitting next to me, stood up in front of the all-black gathering, mixed with Christians and Muslims, and pointed his long finger in my face saying, “You mean to tell me…you Christians…that you don’t see who this man is.” My heart began racing. He was staring down at me. “This man is the devil. The white man is the devil.” I’m quite sure my face was red as I slumped deeper and deeper into the old wooden pew which, thirty seconds previously, was a fine piece of furniture. Now, it was the most uncomfortable chair in the history of the world.

The crowd grew silent. The place, all of the sudden, was eerily empty.

Just when I thought my heart was going to burst, an older African-American woman put her arms around me and said with great passion, “Excuse me, sir. This man (referring to me) is my brother in Christ. I have more in common with this man because we were baptized into the same Lord Jesus.”

For one of the few times in my young life, in that moment, I felt like I belonged to something spiritual, something other-worldly. Never had I been so convinced of the truth and power of the story of Jesus for a modern and complicated society like ours in these United States.

Never had the word “my” sounded so good to me
.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's interesting when you have a teacher and you learn from them, but neglect to learn about them. I wanted to say that I learned more about you and your character yesterday at Big-Small Church, than I probably would have the whole semester. I attend Lapeer Church of Christ, since I am living in Rochester on campus, You might just see a new face at church due to not only my beliefs and religion, but also the way you present yourself and the bible.

-Matthew Smith
*feel free to e-mail, smithmr27@hotmail.com

Josh Ross said...

It is amazing what the waters of baptism can do in this world.

That was the 2nd time I've heard that story, and I still get chills.

Wish I could have been there last evening.

Josh Graves said...

Matthew: Thanks for your kind words. I worried that I'd talked too much. We'd love to have you visit the Rochester family in the future. Most college students come to our 11:30 a.m service.

Boss Ross: That was a defining moment for me . . . a moment that could've turned south in a hurry :)

Anonymous said...

"The conversations ranged from whether or not Joel Osteen’s church is “orthodox” to Barak Obama’s UCC ties in Chicago (c.f. African emphasis); to the marketing that takes place in the confines of the “evangelical Christian ghetto.” It was a spirited conversation, full of wisdom, passion, experience, and (some) humility"



Mr. Wright, the pastor of Trinity UCC, is bigoted and basically said that 9/11 "was a wake up call to white America". He embraces a "black value system" and a "black code of ethics". Let's be careful to embrace a man like that.

Anonymous said...

An article from yesterday: UCC Head Denounces Political "Attacks" on Obama's Church

David, I've written extensively in the comments on another blog about why Obama's association with TUCC does not cause me to question my support for him as a candidate. If you're interested in seeing another perspective, have a read through the comments here: link

A couple articles that are useful for understanding Obama's perspective on TUCC are here (registration required) and here.

Cliff's notes version: I think I understand enough about that community and know that there is enough that I don't understand that I'm more than willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I think people are mistaking as racist what is more accurately described as ministering with a special emphasis on a particular community (a common practice among churches of all types). Wright certainly has some strange views on issues like AIDS, for example, and I wouldn't say I'm totally comfortable with him. However, I'll be voting for Obama, not Wright, and I am convinced that Obama is not at all racially divisive like some believe Wright to be. Instead, Obama is quite the opposite.

Josh Graves said...

David,

Thanks for sharing your own thoughts on this.

Jon,

Thank you and welcome to this blog. At least, I think this is the first time we've met (even if it's an e-meeting). Thanks for providing for some more reading. I'll try and catch up on this tomorrow. Great thoughts overall.

Anonymous said...

So, you're excusing a man who made these comments days after 9/11? You're disgusting and despicable..

You can learn a lot about a person by who their friends are. Obama proclaimed Wright, a racist who pretty much excludes whites from his church, as his spiritual father.

How anybody can even vote for someone who supports partial birth abortion to begin with is beyond me. Be sure to check ontheissues.org before you cast your vote. Be informed.

Anonymous said...

My comments were made to Jon Mower by the way...

Anonymous said...

David,

Thank you very much for clarifying exactly whom you were calling disgusting and despicable. That is appreciated. Thank you for informing me.

I assume you didn't read the articles or the comment thread discussing TUCC that I linked. If you do, you'll see that people with first-hand knowledge of TUCC (as opposed to people who only know what they read on the internet about it) characterize it as a welcoming place for people of all races.

If you read carefully my comment above, you'll see that I admit that Wright does have some wacky views about things like AIDS and 9/11...and I do not "excuse" those. My point is that I support Obama (who does not share those views), not Wright. Wacky views about 9/11 are unfortunately not rare (e.g. Falwell blaming it on the pagans, abortionists, feminists, gays and lesbians...other leaders using it as an excuse to torture...etc).

About abortion, that's a hot button issue with more nuance than I'm sure you will allow. Yes, I wish Obama's policies on abortion were more consistently in support of life. I can say the same about various policies of all the candidates...and in the end my decision is based on a variety of different considerations.

Regardless, I'm not going to bicker with you David. Rest assured that I am informed...but happen to draw different conclusions from the info than you do. If you're really interested in understanding why I draw those conclusion, please read through the things I've linked above. If you believe calling me names will be most effective, have at it...but I'm not optimistic about the prospects for success.

Anonymous said...

Hi Josh,

You're right, this is my first visit here. I expect we'll meet in person in March (WRCC).

Josh Graves said...

Jon,

I apologize that your first visit to the blog and you are called "disgusting and despicable..."--that's simply not right.

David,

I don't mind if you voice your opinions but attacking someone's character, someone you've not met before . . . that lacks any ethos or virtue.

People have responded strongly to you (and vice versa) on this blog, but I don't believe anyone has made a personal attack on you as a person.

If you can't refrain from this, I'll have to ask you to avoid commenting on this site.

Josh Graves said...

BTW--what's "WRCC"? I can't, for the life of me, think of what this is . . . ?

David:

I meant to write this earlier . . . I think it's dangerous to choose a candidate (Repbulican or Democrat) based upon the abortion issue. I know that's not the case with you. You've clearly weighed different issues.

But many people will not consider voting for a man/woman who's position on abortion differs from their own. Which, I think is a bit much considering what it would take to change the "law" here in the U.S.

No one's ever been able to explain to me why some people are just as passionate about unborn babies as they are children born in poverty and children who are the victims of war, genocide, hunger, etc. That's not a "left" or "right" issue--that's a human issue.

preacherman said...

Josh,
I think we focus on big in america today. We want the supersize value meal and a diet coke. When we go to the movies it is the bucket of popcorn and badder buster. We tear down malls that are just fine to build bigger ones. We want the biggest house on the block. The biggest truck that one can haul. We as ministers desire to preach now at the biggest congregations in America.

How do we base church health? A lot of the number you see at bigger churches are church hoppers. Christians that get lost in the crowd and don't want to commit.

I think if you where to see the average size church in america would be between 250 or less.

The mega churches do have their benefit non-the-less offering different ministries.

If the nation of Islam is growing at a faster rate than Christianity it is our own fault. I think we have been focused on ourselves and what can the church do for me for a long time instead of being mission minded. Just now we are seeing a change. We are seeing a new movement. Emergent. A missional movement within the church that is trying to reach out for the cause of Christ.

I pray that we will grow as Christian and spread nation wide.

Josh I pray that God blesses your ministry in a powerful way brother. I hope that every Christian will know that nothing is impossible with God. We can do all things through Christ who gives us strength. God give us a desire to spread your word in America. Let us see America as a mission point. Let us stop be self-centered and do more of your will.

Anonymous said...

Josh,

Sorry...I wondered if WRCC would be too cryptic, and it was. WRCC = Wheeler Road church of Christ. Unless I've confused myself (not out of the question), I think you're coming up to talk about being "missional" in March.

Josh Graves said...

Jon,

I don't have WRCC on my schedule ... but it's possible I made a mistake. I wonder if Patrick (another minister at RCC) is slated to come?

CHeck on that and let me know.

Ha.

JG

Anonymous said...

"We are seeing a new movement. Emergent. A missional movement within the church that is trying to reach out for the cause of Christ."

Emergent is the devils counterfit version of a true move of God away from the dead fundemntal system towards apostolic, NT Christianity. Emergent is a form of godliness that denies the power of God, really a modern day form of Baal worship. It is nothing more then pagan, self rightous, humanism... sure it's not as outdated as dead fundamentalism, but it's just as lacking in the reality of the power of the kingdom of God.

If I carve a block of wood into the shape of a bearded man in a robe and write Jesus at the bottom I am an idolater. If I then feed a homeless person, point to my idol and say "Jesus loves you"... have I glorified the Father or the Son, no I have sinned just as the Baal worshippers did.

The emergent camp has "another Jesus" only he is carved out of the vain imaginations and carnal minds of unregenerate humanists rather then a block of wood.

In Christ - Jim
www.fleebabylon.com

Anonymous said...

can i just say something quick? i love this story. i think it is a beautiful example of what Christ's love is meant to be about. it's like patrick's holding hands blog. it's great!! i wonder sometimes why we can't talk about that. we read a beautiful story like this and we start fighting and tearing each other up about politics. isn't that kind of the opposite of the point the story is trying to make. are we just afraid of it? why can't we talk about what the story is meant to portray and how that can become even more a reality? what are we avoiding? or are we just wanting a good political debate? if we are that's great... but let's not go so far into that that we end up portraying the wrong character in the story... i wanna be the lady who acknowledged her brother- not the one who stood and proclaimed him the devil.

Anonymous said...

Josh,

I want to thank you for your blog. I grew up at Rochester church, and served on some missions with you, but have since left for various reasons. However, I do keep in contact with my youth group friends, and with the progression of the church.

I just wanted to let you know that i find your blog inspiring, and have found that it raises discussion based on the very reasons why I had to eventually separate myself from the church. While I see that some comments are still advocating for a close minded/exclusionary view of how Christians should act/believe, I appreciate you stepping up to advocate for the other side. Thanks, and keep it up.

-L-

Anonymous said...

Josh and Jon, I do apologize for the insults. I will stick to the issues, but I become very angry when people excuse blatant racism.


Mr. Wright was making disparaging comments shortly after 9/11 when the nation was grieving and recovering. And he's going off on white people??? I am finding it difficult to see how that doesn't bother both of you.

Please consider this article by a man who attended Wright's church and was nearly turned away for being white:

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/8/8/194812.shtml?s=lh






"I meant to write this earlier . . . I think it's dangerous to choose a candidate (Repbulican or Democrat) based upon the abortion issue. I know that's not the case with you. You've clearly weighed different issues.

But many people will not consider voting for a man/woman who's position on abortion differs from their own. Which, I think is a bit much considering what it would take to change the "law" here in the U.S."

I've definitely voted for Democrats in the past, but I think almost all of them have been pro-life.

I think it is still a major issue. Consider the partnership that Planned Parenthood had with many of our schools still to this day because of Mr. Clinton.

We've seen Mr. Bush play us social conservatives by sending funding overseas to abortionist agencies, even though he did put Alito and Roberts(two pro-life judges on the Supreme Court).

If you think that Hillary would put conservative judges on the court, then I've got pictures of Robertson and McLaren hugging. ;)

So, the pro-life issue to me is very important. However, I have said in recent days that lower taxes, less spending, and curbing illegal immigration are vital issues to me. They have been long before the 2008 campaigns kicked into high gear.





"No one's ever been able to explain to me why some people are just as passionate about unborn babies as they are children born in poverty and children who are the victims of war, genocide, hunger, etc. That's not a "left" or "right" issue--that's a human issue."

I am more passionate about abortion than those issues because we need to worry about issues that we can control. By making abortion illegal and decreasing the red tape with adoptions, we can susbstantially lower abortion. I believe we should try to feed the homeless, but we need to encourage them to take personal responsibility. That's why I do believe in charity but not welfare. The Bible says that if a man doesn't work, he shouldn't eat.



"Emergent is the devils counterfit version of a true move of God away from the dead fundemntal system towards apostolic, NT Christianity. Emergent is a form of godliness that denies the power of God, really a modern day form of Baal worship."

I couldn't agree more. We can change the way we market Christianity in the church (family nights, sports, financial seminars etc.), but the message should never change. Unfortunately, emergents change the message and weaken the message of sin and hell. Feel good messages of people like Joel Osteen have paved the way for emergent thought. It's very sad.

Anonymous said...

David,

The Newsmax story finally convinced me. I definitely won't be voting for Wright.

But seriously, I'm not saying I'm comfortable with Wright or endorsing his approach, I just don't think he's scandalous...and I think he has little relevance as a reflection on Obama's character.

The author of the Newsmax article describes being asked what he was doing there and an awkward pause after he answered. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't notice where the author claimed to be white or that his encounter with the "large young man" was a result of his skin color or that he asked the "large young man" why he was concerned and was told that it was because he was white...or anything like that.

Josh Graves said...

Long two days.

I may try and respond to some of these posts tomorrow.

Peace on earth.

I hope there aren't any atheists reading this blog. If that's the case, we've given them enough evidence to attack Christianity for the next 12 months.

Josh Graves said...

Jim (Free Babylon): I know you are not interested in a dialog about the Emerging Church. I won't even attempt. We'll have to agree to disagree. I pray peace upon you and the love of Christ.

JLH: Good points. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

"L": Thanks for the kind words. If you ever want to talk about faith, life, or spirituality let me know and we can talk. You can reach me at the church building. Or, send me a note and I'll get you my other contact information.

David: Please don't judge the Emergent/Emergin or Missional Church based on this silly blog. If you took six months and lived among a truly missional church you would see they are: teaching, baptizing, loving, caring, digging wells in Africa, helping folks overcome addiction, talking a great deal about heaven and hell, etc. All the things you lament.

Drama. Drama. Drama.

Anonymous said...

"I hope there aren't any atheists reading this blog. If that's the case, we've given them enough evidence to attack Christianity for the next 12 months."

Could you please try to address some of my points? There's nothing wrong with having debate.

"David: Please don't judge the Emergent/Emergin or Missional Church based on this silly blog."

I don't have to do that. During the fall of 2006, you and many other people presented the propaganda and practices of the emergent church. I was there.

"If you took six months and lived among a truly missional church you would see they are: teaching, baptizing, loving, caring, digging wells in Africa, helping folks overcome addiction, talking a great deal about heaven and hell, etc. All the things you lament."

I attend THE Missionary Church which has sent missionaries to Africa many times. They don't have to compromise what they believe.

And it's not that I don't care about these issues. It's just that we can make a difference for a life so easily by showing pictures of the babies, encouraging adoption, and stressing that marriage means something.

Kara Graves said...

I previously posted this and later erased it, but I feel like I need to ask this question:

Now, before the question is asked, I fully believe that differences of opinion are highly valuable. Josh and I don't agree a lot of the time, but in those conversations you are able to learn a lot...about yourself and about another view.

Saying that, If you are a person that finds themselves disagreeing with 99% of what a blog author writes, and 80% of what the other commenters say, at what point do you move on to other places/blogs where you don't feel the need to negate, become defensive and argue every point?

I am all about different ideas and opinions, but there is a way to do it with respect and an open heart and mind...that is willing to consider what others have on their heart.

Anonymous said...

I've agreed with Josh on some issues, disagreed on others, and he's made me change my opinion on some even if we don't completely agree.

I messed up earlier by insulting the other gentleman. But overall, I've thought that Josh has welcomed me here. I don't argue for the sake of argument, and I thought that Josh has seen that. I could be wrong...

I am simply presenting the view of some evangelicals in the church hold dear. I am saying what others at Rochester are thinking but too afraid to say for fear of being punished or slighted. Believe me, I have talked to several of them.

As an alumnus, I care about what goes on at the college.

Anonymous said...

David,

My name is Calvin Moore and I was the interviewer for the conversation held at Rochester College. In regards to Barak Obama's church ties, there was definitely not a "letting off the hook" for the racism preached there. That really was the trajectory of the question--is a church that focuses on one race above another even to be considered a church. And we're not talking about accidentals here. An accidental is where a church is predominantly one color because that is all there is in the area (another conversation altogether). But, the fact that this church pushes a race-related agenda was a question we decided to tackle that night. Maybe you might want to take a liten to the podcast of the conversation. It's available for free download on I-Tunes. Keywords: Rochester College, House of God Sessions

Josh Graves said...

The podcast does put the noted segment in context. Good point Calvin.