*Jesus came to bring Israel back to Torah-abiding, justice-executing ways.
*The important council's of the 5th centuries definitively gave the church language to understand who Jesus really was (fully God and fully human--a belief we moderns take for granted)
*The split of the Western Church (Catholicism) and the Eastern Church (Orthodox) and the Oriental Orthodoxy (Coptic, Syrian, etc.).
*Martin Luther's Reformation of Catholicism in the 16th century
*The Great Emergence of the late 20th/early 21st century (sometimes mentioned as postmodernism).
Every five hundred years, the rummage sale comes a knockin'. This is the premise of Phyllis Tickle's new book The Great Emergence. A "short epic" (thanks for that expression Jonathan), this book covers the major threads of Christianity as a social movement over the last two thousand years. Tickle masterfully weaves in and out the complexities of Christianity's spread: the good, the bad, and the downright ugly.
Too many highlights to cover, so I'll mention just one facet. Towards the end of GE, Tickle attempts to describe the different branches/response of Christians in this new reality, this emerging world landscape (141-143).
- Traditionalists: "Like those who have fallen heir to Grandpa's old home place and who still like things just the way he had them, they see no need either to fight with the neighbors or to change the furniture." This group is content, fine with business as usual.
- Re-traditioning: This group has chosen to stay with their inherited group, but unlike the Traditionalists "they energetically wish to make it [the church] more fully what it originally was." These folks want to keep the house, but make major interior changes and modifications: create a new kitchen, update the plumbing, drop new floors.
- Progressives: "[W]hile wanting to maintain their position in institutional Christianity, they want also to wrestle with what they see as the foolheartedness of holding on to dogma based ideas and doctrinally restricted governance and praxis." This group will knock out some walls, extend favorite rooms, even build additions if need be.
- Hyphenateds: "[T]hey recognize theirs is the most schizophrenic of the encompassing circles . . . householders who have fallen heir to Grandpa's old home place, feel a compelling need to honor the land it sits upon and the trees that surround it, but no need to retain its structural shape. Imaginatively enough, though, while they may tear down the house, they will savage some of the material out of which it was built and incorporate those honored bricks and columns, plinths and antique doors into the new thing they are building."
---
Which stream do you find yourself in?
2 comments:
I think I'm finding myself as a bit of a hyphenated between re-traditionalist and progressive. I do enjoy some of the traditions of the tribe of which I am a part, but I feel an urgent need for exuberant life in the church universal. Some bodies are doing this, but so many are stagnating in the old traditions and teaching their children that in order to be close to God they must stagnate too. I fully believe in worshipping with reverence and awe, but does that always mean we come together as a family of stoics who can get our favorite sports team but dare not shout "Hallelujah!" about our favorite God? For example, I love the tradition of a capella singing in this particular tribe, but who are we to deny praising God with the ability and passion to play musical instruments that He has instilled in so many of us? Will a musical instrument get me banned from Heaven? I sure hope not, because my percussion degree will surely have been a huge waste of time and money!
Sorry for the tangent. It happens. Peace, Love, and Chocolate
Uncle Mo-Mo
Love that name. Thanks for the comment.
I'll post later on where I find myself.
Keep eating chocolate.
JG
Post a Comment